Booze in the city

On October 27, 2008, in change, by Steve McDonald

In my home town of Melbourne, binge drinking and violence among younger people is a growing public concern.

beerIn a poll taken early this year, 72% of respondents believed that the city is becoming more violent.  Responses from government and police have included restricting entry to drinking venues after 2am and increasing the police presence in the city.
Let’s take a look at some of the possible cause and effect links here, based on Clare W Graves’ research into human nature.

The teen years and early twenties are a time of great personal change as we transition to adulthood.  This involves breaking away from our family-focused childhood and exploring our identity and our personal power.  The emotion driving this transition is anger; hence the stereotype of the ‘angry young man’ (or woman) attempting to make a mark on the world.

When we go through this type of major change, from a psychological perspective it involves achieving some form of detachment so we can look back objectively at our previous way of being.  What was once a subjective experience becomes the focus of our detached, objective consideration.

This detachment is an altered state of awareness.  Something changes our viewpoint enough to allow us to see things differently.  This can be achieved in myriad ways, one of which is through the use of alcohol or drugs.  In 1973, Clare W Graves said ‘You go to any society…at any time it changed from one way of thinking to another and you’ll find it always has a drug problem.’

Other ways to achieve altered states include exercise, meditation and art – there are countless options.  Interestingly, research has shown that human development can be accelerated through the regular practice of altered states of awareness, particularly meditation.  There are obvious disadvantages in using an excess of alcohol for this purpose though, due to its long term health effects and its impact on behaviour.

Graves’ research also looked at physiological changes in the brain and found that as we transition through stages of development, our brains literally rewire themselves and activate new capacities.  His theory correlates with the findings of a recent study conducted by the University of Melbourne[2] into teenage brain development.  In an article published early this year, lead researcher Nicholas Allen said of teenagers ‘Their emotions are developing much faster than are the parts of the brain that help them to manage their emotions.’ (read more here)

This is an important issue in terms of understanding their behaviour.  It means that they haven’t yet developed the capacity to modulate their emotions or to be fully aware of the impact of their behaviour on others, in the same way most adults can.

So all this tells us it’s natural for young people to seek out opportunities to explore their personal power and identity.  It’s also natural that they’ll seek opportunities for altering their state of awareness, since this is normal human behaviour when experiencing change.  And while their brains are still developing, it’d be silly for us to expect them to exercise the same restraint as an adult.

So the question is, how does society attend to the needs of young people so they can navigate this transition to adulthood more easily and safely?

Postmodern society has downplayed formal rites of passage, structured discipline in schools and strict moral codes.  Once teenagers grew up within well defined moral boundaries, but today there is much greater freedom.  That freedom allows them to push the limits of acceptable social behaviour more easily.  In the absence of any formal initiation into adulthood, together with their peers, teenagers often create their own rites of passage to mark this milestone.

When problems arise like our current drinking and violence issues, they’re symptoms of something deeper.  In this case, they point to a need to support young people in transition.  This means creating safe opportunities for self expression, allowing them to both explore their personal power and begin making their mark on society.  Some practical examples might include an increased use of sport and exercise as an outlet, legal graffiti galleries, organising more music and dance events specifically for the younger age group etc.  Perhaps there’s also a need to reinstate some kind of formal celebration of the rite of passage to adulthood – something that’s appropriate for this day and age.

Since the expression of personal power is a natural aspect of this phase of life, any attempt to ‘eradicate’ the behaviour is destined to be unsuccessful.  If it’s squashed down in one area, it will soon reappear in another. In fact, attempts to confront ‘power with power’ can actually generate more of the same.  It makes much more sense to channel the energy in safe and socially acceptable ways.  If we empower young people by allowing them to co-create these alternative channels for their energy, it’s a win for all concerned.

There will always be a minority that goes to extremes and therefore a need for enforcement of the law.  But until we provide more and better outlets for aggressive young energy, we should expect more of the same.

Incidentally, Graves’ theory also holds true at a collective level.  So communities and societies that are moving beyond a tribal mindset will exhibit the same need to express power and explore identity as teenagers do, but on a larger scale.  These are the very same dynamics that our troops are facing in places like Iraq and Afghanistan and they’re the same issues that are causing grief in Aboriginal communities, evidenced by substance abuse and power based anti-social behaviours.

The keys to managing all of these situations are firstly, understanding the natural dynamics at play and secondly, shaping the life conditions so that the natural energies can express themselves in safe and socially acceptable ways.

Tagged with:
 

Poverty and change – my time in Somalia, 1993

On October 15, 2008, in change, by Steve McDonald

This post won 2nd prize in the 2008 World Vision Blog Action Day competition, thanks WV!

In 1993 I spent five months in Somalia, Africa as part of the international humanitarian intervention called Operation

Refugee camp Mogadishu 1993

Refugee camp Mogadishu 1993

Restore Hope.  Back then I was an infantry officer serving with the 1st Battalion, Royal Australian Regiment (1 RAR).  The Australian Army contributed about 1,000 troops to Operation Restore Hope, which was the first deployment of an Australian combat unit to a war zone since Vietnam.

In 1992 the United Nations had launched UNOSOM I to monitor a ceasefire between local warlords and  to escort relief supplies to distribution centres, as famine threatened 1.5 million Somalis.  The security situation deteriorated later that year and aid workers came under attack, seriously hampering the relief effort.  In November 1992 the United States offered to lead an international military intervention to restore security in Somalia and to re-establish food distribution.  The UN security council accepted this offer and Australia subsequently committed the 1 RAR Battalion Group to the Unified Task Force (UNITAF).  UNITAF was not a UN force, it was a coalition of willing nations.

I was the first member of 1 RAR to arrive in Somalia, on 2nd January 1993.  I spent about two weeks working at the UNITAF Headquarters in Mogadishu, preparing for the arrival of the main Australian contingent by air and sea.  US Forces were still bringing local warlords under control at that time, and the old US Embassy compound which housed the headquarters came under regular fire.  During my first few days in country, I wrote:

‘It is clear that the Somalis caused their famine through fighting and destroying their infrastructure. It has little to do with drought and lack of food.’
Diary entry, 7th January 1993.

Early one morning I woke to the sound of US Marines attacking a nearby warlord stronghold, and watched as Cobra attack helicopters hovered nearby, firing into the target area.  I was surprised at the pilots’ lack of apparent concern for enemy fire, as they were making themselves easy targets.  Later that year two US Army helicopters were shot down in the same area, now made famous by the film Blackhawk Down.

Once the main elements of the 1 RAR Battalion Group arrived in Mogadishu, we deployed some 240 kms inland to the town of Baidoa and began taking control of our Humanitarian Relief Sector (an area of about 17,000 square kilometres).  Our task was to provide security so that UN relief operations could be restored.

I was amazed at what I saw in Baidoa.  The town was once home to a Coca-Cola factory, a Fiat car factory and an agricultural college, but these were now all in ruins.  There was no government, no mains power, no running water and no sanitation.  Many public buildings had been stripped of timber for use as firewood.  Tens of thousands of refugees lived in makeshift camps on the edges of town.  How could a civilization regress like this?

Visiting an orphanage in Baidoa, Somalia 1993

Visiting an orphanage in Baidoa, Somalia 1993

Our presence over the next four months brought peace and relief, and we were popular with everyone except the bandits.  The UN food relief and the many NGO healthcare operations resumed their activities.  Slowly but surely, local businesses began to flourish and with our support the local police service and judicial system were restored.

It was clear to me at the time though, that these results were not sustainable.  The age old inter-clan conflicts were not being resolved and as soon as we left, Somalia was likely to descend into chaos once again.  History shows that it did.

So on Blog Action Day in 2008, what lessons can we learn from this experience that might help us deal with poverty?  Well firstly, solving poverty is a complex business.  It’s not just about redistributing food or wealth.  Countries that suffer from poverty do so because of complex cause and effect relationships, which must be understood and addressed before lasting results can be achieved.  The natural human instinct to want to help others be ‘just like us’ is often not so helpful.

In working towards sustainable results, we must be mindful of a country’s stage of social development.  Planning must consider what their next natural step will be, and how that might impact on their social systems and government.  Many developing countries, and Iraq and Afghanistan are good recent examples, are not yet ready for USA-style democratic nationhood.  The local life conditions dictate that simpler and often localised or regional systems are much more appropriate.  Tribal bonds and regional power struggles still carry much more weight than any sense of nationhood.

Thankfully the world is waking up to the complexity of the problem, and the need for sustainable solutions.  As with all large scale social issues, we must look to the deep underlying patterns of change in order to understand cause and effect, and then deal with the causes.  Addressing the surface level symptoms is not enough.

Tagged with: